School Uniforms Should Be Public Schools - 968 Words

School Uniforms Parents around the globe have emphasized the controversy over school uniforms. During the school year of 2011-2012, one in every five school required students to wear school uniforms. America s first documented schools to inaugurate uniforms were in Maryland and Washington. Throughout the previous years in America, there have been numerous disputes whether school uniforms should be in public schools. In the last 30 years, public schools have often been hostilely compared to private schools. This being said some public schools decided to change their dress code policy. Recently, Kids Fashion Expert, Michelle Kouzmine, from About Style decided to probe into the debate on School Uniforms. Educators believe when students wear uniforms, they feel more professional and behave accordingly, stated Kouzmine in her article on Uniforms. Therefore, when all students are dressed in regulation uniforms, there is less focus on fashion in the classroom and more focus on learning. An opposing article was offered by Christopher Cascio from website global post, around the same time. Cascio acknowledges that school uniforms are instigated all across the U.S. and claims they are expensive and stifle student creativity. School Uniforms fail to reduce behavioral problems or create a sense of equality among students of varying socioeconomic classes Christopher Cascio tackles the same arguments that Kouzmine addresses in her argument. These next few paragraphs willShow MoreRelatedShould Uniforms Be Used in Public Schools?1150 Words   |  5 Pagestouchiest subjects of public schools would be about if they should enforce school uniforms, or should they just enforce a dress code? This subject has many different views, and plenty of good pros and cons on the matter. In our personal belief, we think that schools should only enforce dress codes, and stay away from assigning specific uniforms. Obviously everyone has their own view on this, we are going to give you some ins ight on how dress codes could do more harm on public schools than good. TeachersRead MorePublic Schools Should Adopt A School Uniform Policy889 Words   |  4 Pagesall public schools should adopt a school uniform policy, and there is a paragraph with a counter argument with school uniforms. There is a discussion on how the crime rate decreases amongst students, how uniforms save the families money, how gang related activities have decreased, and how there is less stress between students and parents. By the time you finish reading this paper, you too should agree that all public schools should adopt a school uniform policy. All Public Schools ShouldRead MoreSchool Uniforms: Should They Be Required in Public Schools? Essay925 Words   |  4 Pages Every year there is a large debate about school uniforms and whether they should be required in our public schools, or not. Some parents and school staff think that uniform policies should be enforced, as they feel it provides a sense of safety, structure, a lack of ridicule and modesty to our children. On the other hand, there are parents that argue that it takes away a child’s freedom of expression, independence, free spirit and individuality. Both parties have good and effective arguments andRead MoreShould Uniforms Be Required For Public School Students?1203 Words   |  5 PagesThe idea of uniforms being required for public school students has been a widely controversial topic in the recent past. In the 2003-2004 school year, only one in eight public schools required students to wear uniforms (ProConorg Headlines). In the 2013-2014 school year, on e in five public schools required students to wear uniforms (ProConorg Headlines). This essay will discuss the reasons that uniforms restrict the individuality of students, burdens families that cannot afford two sets of clothesRead MoreShould Public Schools Require Uniforms Essay705 Words   |  3 PagesThere are several reasons public schools should require uniforms. â€Å"School uniforms are one of several strategies being used by this nation’s public schools to restore order in the classroom and safety in the schools† (Stanley, 2). â€Å"In addition to encouraging students to concentrate on learning, rather than on what to wear, uniforms can be social equalizers that promote peer acceptances, as well as school spirit and school pride† (Stanley, 2). School uniforms make it easier for students not toRead MoreShould Public Schools Require Uniforms? Essay2356 Words   |  10 PagesWhen I was a child attending elementary school all of my friends loved the way I dressed, but there was also other children that attended school with me that seemed inferior to me simply because of how I dressed. Usually the children that praised the way I dress always wore nice clothes themselves, while the others who didn’t dress ad nice would try to pick fights or make fun of children that did dress nice. Later on in my life as I approached high school the tables turned; the teenagers who dressedRead MoreSchool Uniforms Should Be Implemented Throughout K 12 Public Schools1258 Words   |  6 PagesBobby Mishra Mrs. Bezemek Apps of Comp 24 November 2014 School Uniforms According to a study done by the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) said that the popularity of school uniforms are clearly on the rise. Now more schools have uniforms rising from 28 percent to 49 percent in thirteen years (Tucker). School uniforms can help improve behavior leading to safer schools and safer communities. School uniforms can also lead to an increase in academic behavior leading to betterRead MoreShould Public School System Be Mandatory Uniform Policy?1869 Words   |  8 Pages School Uniforms Sarah Chaudhry SOC 1020-090 University of Utah Fall 2015 â€Æ' Abstract: Unfortunately, public school has become less about education and more about being fashion forward. As a society, there is definitely a higher tendency for people to judge a person’s entire personality solely on what and how they are dressed. The desire to have the latest trending clothes is in far greater demand than to have the highest grades. As a result many issues such as vandalism, bullying, sexual harassmentRead MoreEssay on Three Reasons Why Public Schools Should Wear Uniforms664 Words   |  3 Pagesseen here, in the USA few public schools have need of students to wear a uniform. I went to school in Mexico City and I got to wear uniform every day. It is very common there for students to be dress in uniforms. Most of the time, I think kids in this country are very spoiled and very selfish too. For them to wear an uniform to go to school it is very offensive. The reason is they think they can no longer express themselves. I agree that asking students to wear a unifor m won’t change their attitudeRead MoreOver The Past Years, Most Public School Administrators1385 Words   |  6 PagesOver the past years, most public school administrators have been engaged in the heated debate over whether public school students should put on school uniforms or not. This important argument has drawn the attention of both liberal thinkers and conservatives. From one far end, a section of the society feels that public school students school have the freedom to put on their clothing of choice while the other section feels that there should be uniformity in the public-school attire. Based on such contradicting

fuctions of management Essay - 975 Words

Out of the four topics I would say the first step in the four functions of management is organizing. Organizing The first step of organizing would be self-organizing and time management. Without self-organizing your team will not be organized and will start going to other places for leadership. Once the self-organizing is done then the manager can start organizing the team. Time management for your team should be a priority the team leader. The next step would be to develop a matrix and a chain of command. A clear chain of command will help organize the team. In my opinion Planning is the second step. Without proper planning the team or workers will start making their own plans and those plans may not be want the manager wants.†¦show more content†¦One valuable tool I have learned to use that helps me be a good leader is the website Out of the Box Coachingâ„ ¢ and Breakthroughs with the Enneagram by Mary R. Bast, Ph.D. 2005 she describes nine leadership styles and the faults and descriptions and as well as development skill. LEADERSHIP STYLE ONE: The Idealist A self-observing Idealist can be a wonderful leader: wise, tolerant, balanced, and focused on standards of excellence in ways that provide an exemplary vision for followers. Ones are often the purveyors of quality in an organization. LEADERSHIP STYLE TWO: The Mentor The most interpersonally oriented of all the leadership styles, healthy Mentors are unconditionally caring leaders who derive deep satisfaction from seeing and encouraging the development of others; they are typically great supporters of customer service. Well-developed Twos will also be aware of their own needs, which provides balance in their lives and allows them to give freely, without expectation of return. LEADERSHIP STYLE THREE: The Star Star leaders are often expansive, risk-taking go-getters who ensure high productivity for their organizations. Formidable models for others, they are efficient and supremely goal-oriented; consequently, they tend to rise to top organizational levels, or to run their own companies. LEADERSHIP STYLE FOUR: The Innovator Innovators are vital to the health of an organization because they are able to view things from aShow MoreRelated7-Eleven Management Control1601 Words   |  7 PagesGlobal 7-Eleven Management Control INTRODUCTION. Control. In management control is a critical fuction. Management control problem can lead to large loses and possibly even to organizational failure. (Kenneth and Van Der Stede, 2004). Why controlling became the crucial thing on an organization or company? it because controlling handle the process of monitoring, comparing, and correcting work performance. (Robbins and Coulter, 2009). So, what the impact to the company or organization ifRead MoreTop Ranking Private Bank Of Bangladesh1276 Words   |  6 Pagesthe ovarall performance for the organization. premier bank is a top ranking private bank of Bangladesh. As a successful commercial bank it follows all the managerial fuctions properly. Planning: It is important for a bank to formulate it:s plans and set the objectives according to the business environment around. Premier bank management carry out their plans quite intelligently. Planing: premier bank formulate it s plans and strategies accurately. Deposit Money: They collect deposit from publicRead MoreEssay about Gscm803 Words   |  4 PagesAfterwards the assembly of both the product is done at German assembly plant. Now due to recent development of the video capable in Bugabyte there is delay in production which contributes to 30 percent late delivery rate. Due to this reason the management decide to outsource the assembly process to one of the suppliers. They hired the services of Grunwald and Vogel to reduce the percentage of late delivery rate. The risk factors include in outsourcing the assembly process are as below: a) Quality:Read MoreAdvantages And Disadvantages Of Ip Implementation Of International Game Technology956 Words   |  4 PagesHaspreet Kaur Submitted to = Ms. Vivien Li Table of contents A. Introduction: 3 B. The key goals the IGT wanted to achieve using an ERP system: 3 C. Advantages and disadvantages of customising the system: 3 D.Ways IGT needs to adopt to handle change management during ERP implementation: 4 E. Conclusion: 5 F. Reference: 6 â€Æ' A. Introduction: This assignment is having a case study on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation of International Game Technology (IGT), a manufacturer of slot machinesRead MoreManaging Information Overload1140 Words   |  5 Pageseffects on an organizations performance. Within, technical and social systems there are a collection of complex components that solve problems within that system. Knowledge management uses the combination and utilization of technology at every phase that is available within the organization. Social and technical framework for management of knowledge is an appropriate method than an organization can use to handle problems due to information overload. In using both a social and technical approach withinRead MoreDesigning A Validation Package For Quality Assurance965 Words   |  4 PagesComputerized Calculations  · Documentation produced from testing (evidence that the requirements of Section 5.3, 5.3, and 5.4 of this procedure have been met) 5.1.2. All phases of the validation will be approved by Quality Assurance. Laboratory management will assign a qualified person(s) to serve as Validator. 5.1.3. The validation will be assigned a title and version (e.g. 3-Nitro Result Calculator, Version 1.0). 5.1.4. The software name and version will be documented, along with theRead MoreElectronic Medical Record ( Emr )1685 Words   |  7 Pagesorganizations is to identify a problem. Once the problem is address you would idenitfy the decision makers and clarify the goals. So we would need back information about each practice which includes size, network info, and etc.We would need to the know the fuction of the electronic medical records. Aslo, the vdendor information such as the company history, employees, and etc. Electronic medical records will have a big impact on your practice so we have to make sure we choose the right vendor. This level ofRead MoreMy Pastime As A Child1375 Words   |  6 Pagesguide the student’s performance to the desired behavior by the teacher. If at least one student models good conduct it is possible for others to follow in the predicted behavior (Moore, 2011). This principle is important to integrate in a classroom management plan. Clear classroom strategies and interventions must be discussed and enforced to promote model behavior. However, the progressive attitudes can still be incorporated while such regulations are created. Students can be involved in the makingRead MoreThe Importance of an Efficient Group Work Activity 1807 Words   |  7 Pagesmost common problem in classes during my observations. It is so crucial problem, as it is accepted that group work helps students to enhance speaking skill by working together and communicating with each other. Group work and pair work is a class management strategy and the teachers’ role is facilitator. This role in group work is very difficult and very important. These reasons makes using group work activities so significant. â€Å"Groups often come up with more and better solutions than the individualRead MoreImportance of Budgets2532 Words   |  11 PagesBudgeting Methods There are two establish method for budgeting: top-down and bottom-up which is best for your project depends on your organization’s standard approach to decision making. Does management dictate most mandates? Or is the staff expected to produce ideas and decision that percolate up to management for final analysis? Your answer to this question will determine the most likely budgeting approach for the project.(G. Michael, 2007). Bottom-up Budgeting In bottom-up budgeting, staff members

Does God Protect Us free essay sample

We will question why it is important for Christians to understand how God’s providence works and where they will find strength in God during the midst of suffering. This topic is one of vital importance to help overcome obstacles in life and to grasp that faith in God doesn’t protect people in a way they sometimes expect to be protected. Badger-Saye’s article begins with what he regards as bad theology. He uses a letter that was sent to his friend who was suffering with cancer to demonstrate bad theology. The Christian women said in the letter that it was God’s will that he shall be miraculously healed, all he had to do was believe. If he was not healed, she implied it would be his own fault. She assumed that God controls all events, she had to create a justification for God’s apparent inaction in this case. In response to the letter the cancer patient refuted the idea that his faith had any direct affect on how he may be healed, but gave him strength in the face of suffering and to believe his suffering would be absent in his next life (Bader-Saye 2007). Furthermore to believe in a God that provided instant healing from suffering would mean that God had a bias toward the faithful, that granted their every wish. This belief contradicts the universal love of God as shown in the scriptures,  Ã¢â‚¬Å"I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has given me strength, that he considered me trustworthy, appointing me to his service. Even though I was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent man, I was shown mercy because I acted in ignorance and unbelief. The grace of our Lord was poured out on me abundantly, along with the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus. † (1 Tim. 1:12). Bader-Saye also points out that Jesus made his view quite clear that suffering and tragedies did not result in a lack of faith, the victims did not deserve their death or affliction anymore than anyone else (Bader-Saye 2007). The protection that God provides us with is the assurance of provision and the promise of redemption. This is often not easy to comprehend when one is suffering or has witnessed terrible atrocities. The author points out how one should respond to the circumstances of one’s life, by using an acting analogy. The reaction to events that happen in one’s life or possibly God’s providence can be taken three ways, by accepting, blocking or overaccepting. To accept is simply to accept the situation. Blocking is the refusal to co-operate with the situation, either to reject or to begrudge the confronting issue. Overaccepting indicates a willingness to receive any situation as a piece to the larger life puzzle, trusting that redemption will come one day, in this life or the next (Bader-Saye 2007). Bader-Saye provides the story of Joseph in Genesis as an example to demonstrate overaccepting, â€Å"Even though you intended to do harm to me, God intended it for good† (Gen. 50:20). As a result of overaccepting one must believe that the end result will be good, because God epitomises good. â€Å"For it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose. † (Phil 2:13) The most powerful example of overaccepting is the crucifixion of Jesus, he accepts the evil done to him to fulfill the will of God, and to accomplish the reason for his being. This tells us a great deal about how God acts in the world. If God does not use influencing power to block evil and suffering, then why should we expect God to manipulate the painful circumstances from which we seek. Bader-Saye concludes by stating that the seeking of the kingdom of God should be our first priority, being safe and secure in our personal lives should not take preference over being faithful. If being faithful leads to suffering or harm, then one should take security in Gods providence and redemption. One must trust that God will reincorporate all things in the heavenly city (Bader-Saye 2007). To grasp the concept of overaccepting can be quite trying during difficult times, it often tests ones faith to the limit. Some people who once believed in God’s providence eventually give up on God all together because they don’t see direct answers to their prayers. This is all the more reason to grasp overaccepting, so suffering is not permitted to defeat them and they can move on with their lives gratefully. Two common responses by people during times of despair are â€Å"It’s part of Gods plan,† and â€Å"God is punishing us for our wrong doing. Both of these statements assume that human freedom and responsibility can be limited by God’s plan (Scovell 2004). The assumption that God is the direct cause of all that happens in the world, implies that we are mere puppets controlled by the master . The second assumption, that God is punishing us for our wrong doings is as absurd as the first (Hauser 1995), the entire belief that Jesus died for our si ns gives us a chance to repent and confess our sins. To suggest God goes around enforcing suffering on sinners as punishment, is misguided, this removes the need of Jesus to have ever walked on this Earth . Evil does exist in the world. It strikes at the great and the obscure, the virtuous and the vile, the young and the old with arbitrary indifference (Artson 1998). Therefore it is inevitable that suffering will occur because of the existence of evil, but through overacceptance it can be overcome. Overacceptance involves forgiveness towards the cause of the infliction, to forgive with compassion and love, not excusing the offense but understanding the pain from which almost every offense proceeds. God is the one who forgives and reconciles, we can learn what it means by entering a relationship with God which risks being wounded (Garvey 1999). During the time of suffering how does God strengthen us? In the same way that God does not directly move us like chess pieces in the game of life, he does not directly exalt us by taking away our pain or relieve us from our worries. We find strength in God during suffering by knowing we are not facing our suffering alone, along with the promise of redemption and salvation. As Paul writes about his suffering, â€Å"Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. But he said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness. ’ Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me. That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong. † (Hauser 1995) So to block the suffering as described by Bader-Saye, is to not use the strength found in God to move past the grievance and to not have the vision to see it amidst the bigger picture. Many of our troubles often turn out as blessings in disguise in the long run, â€Å"My troubles turned out all for the best, they forced me to learn from your textbook. † (Psalm 119:71) So to block them we are only prolonging the suffering and are not continuing towards the promise of God. In conclusion, the message from the tutorial reading makes a valuable point. Misfortunes and evil fall upon us unavoidably throughout our lives, they do not fall upon us as a result of ones bad behavior or because God controls every aspect of our lives. Suffering is often unable to be explained, sometimes words are not an appropriate response for the evil that is done. It is not easy to accept misfortune and eagerly look towards the future, as overaccepting implies. If we learn from Christ and attempt to comprehend the way he lived and faced hard times, and find strength in God during the times of suffering, it is possible to relieve the suffering and move past the circumstances of the moment, and direct ourselves towards the final Kingdom of God. Bibliography Artson, Bradley Shavit (1998), On Suffering, Tikkun, Volume 13 (Issue 4). Bader-Saye, Scott (2007) Following Jesus in a Culture of Fear [online text], Brazos Press Garvey, John (1999), A God who hurts, Commonweal, Volume 126 (Issue 17). Hauser, Richard J (1995), Where is God in suffering? , Religion and Theology, Vol 172 (Iss 12). Plantinga, Alvin Warranted Christian Belief, . Scovell, Rob (2004), Understanding Gods Plan, Waikato Times.

U.S. Foreign Policy in Vietnam Essay Example For Students

U.S. Foreign Policy in Vietnam Essay U.S. ForeignPolicy in VietnamIn the history of the United States, ourforeign policy has caused many disputes over the proper role in internationalaffairs. Because of the unique beliefs and ideals by which we livein this country, we feel obligated to act as leaders of the world and helpother countries in need. Therefore, the U.S. has attempted to somehowcombine this attitude with economic and strategic gain. After WorldWar II, the Cold War was initiated, and Americas fear of communism ledTruman to begin the endeavors of the containment of communism. As a result, the U.S. became involved with Korea and then Vietnam. The U.S. was determined not to let South Vietnam fall to the communistsbecause President Eisenhower once stated that the fall of Vietnam wouldhave a domino effect. Unfortunately, not everyone viewed Vietnamthe same way as Eisenhower. Opponents of the war believed that theU.S. had no right to intervene in this civil war, while supporters maintainthe attitude of moral obligation for the world by defending freedom anddemocracy from communism. Three historians in Conflict and Consensuscarefully examine our foreign policy and involvement in the Vietnam War. We will write a custom essay on U.S. Foreign Policy in Vietnam specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Each article emphasizes different points and explains how one of the mostpowerful countries in the world lost the war. In the first article, Gods Country andAmerican Know-How, Loren Baritz argues that the American myth of superioritybased on nationalism, technology, and moral ideals brought the U.S. intothe war. The Americans never understood the Vietnamese culture andtheir true sentiments on the war. Nevertheless, because of our powerand moral prowess, the U.S. was confident that we would prevail. This was our biggest mistake; we were blind and ignorant(473). Baritz states that we were frustrated by the incomprehensible behaviorof our Vietnamese enemies and bewildered by the inexplicable behavior ofour Vietnamese friends(470). Because of our isolation on the NorthAmerican Continent, the U.S. had a difficult time understanding the exoticcultures around the world, especially Vietnam. Thus, as a directresult, Americans considered foreign courtesies and rituals crude and inferiorto the customs of the civilized country of America. This point isquite sad and embarassing, but Baritz points out that cultural isolation(476)occurs all over the world. It is the Solipsistic philosophy thatthe universe revolves around the earth, just as all the nations of theworld revolve around the U.S. According to John Winthrop, we arethe Chosen People(473) because of Gods favor and presence. Soare we obligated to set the standards of culture for the world? Becauseof our prominence and success as a prosperous nation, we stand forth asleaders; however, no country ca n define the culture of another nation. The U.S. failed to understand that everyone prefers their own language,diet and funeral customs(475). Upon first impression, the Americansoldiers viewed the Vietnamese people as savages because they lived likeanimals(470). Thus, the soldiers failed to appreciate the organicnature of Vietnamese society, the significance of village life, the meaningof ancestors, the relationship of the family to the state, the subordinaterole of the individual, and the eternal quest for universal agreement(470). Just because the Vietnamese were poor, we presumed that they were beggingfor our help; we were attempting to build a nation in our own image(471). Furthermore, it is not the ingratitude or stupidity(470) which sparkedthe Vietnamese resistance against U.S. soldiers but rather a cultural misunderstanding. Baritz believes that this ignorance ofculture is one of the primary reasons why we lost the war. Dr. HenryKissinger even admitted that no one in this government understands NorthVietnam(471). We even thought we understood the Vietnamese to someextent by thinking that life is cheap in the Orient(471). However,this ridiculous comment rose from our ability to use technology to protectour own troops while the North Vietnamese were forced to rely on people,their only resource(471). This meant that the Vietnamese were willingto sacrifice as many men as possible to win the war. Our ignoranceprevented us from overcoming this kind of warfare. As for the cultural misunderstanding ofour allies, the South Vietnamese, Baritz points out one custom which theAmerican soldiers could not tolerate: soldiers holding hands. Vietnamesesoldiers held hands with other accompanying soldiers. This was ashow of friendship for the Vietnamese, but for Americans, holding handswas a sign of homosexuality. American soldiers measured up to themilitarys definition of manhood(472) by compeletely condemning homosexuality. This simple custom caused many problems between the U.S. soldiers and theSouth Vietnamese. Baritz now provides the other argumentfor entering the Vietnam War: The Cold War. In this argument,the U.S. is more concerned with showing off our strong military power withstrategic planning in the nuclear arms race against the Soviet Union. They Soviets knew, and we knew, that this threat was not entirely real,and that it freed the Soviets to engage in peripheral adventures becausethey correctly believed that we would not destroy the world over Korea,Berlin, Hungary or Czechoslovakia(480). Thus, we extended the armsrace in limited wars(480) around the globe. We demonstrated thisin Korea, and the situation is the same in Vietnam; we had to find a technologyto win without broadening the war(481). We felt invincible; up tothe Vietnam War, we had never lost a war. We had already beatenthe Indians, French, British, Mexicans, Spaniard, Germans, Italians, Japanese,Koreans, and Chinese(479). The U.S. was becoming too confident inrelying on our technology to beat the North Vietnamese. We thoughtwe could bomb them into their senses with only limited human costs to ourselves(483). Technology gave us the ability to organize precise strategic maneuversand attacks, but unfortunately, the simple guerrilla warfare of the Vietnamesewas overpowering. Our national myth showed us that we were good,our technology made us strong and our bureaucracy gave us standard operatingprocedures(483), but even with this combination, the strategy was notgood enough to win the war. In the second article, The Legacy of Vietnam,Guenter Lewy carefully discusses the assumption that Vietnam and all ofSoutheast Asia are important for strategic and economic gains for the U.S. For strategic purposes, Lewy believes that by defeating the North Vietnamese,America might contain Communist China because the Chinese threatened tochange the status quo in Asia by force(485). As mentioned before,Truman wanted to contain communism and prevent the rapid spread of theevil, and Eisenhower believed that controlling Vietnam was the key to continuethe containment. However, Lewy believes that the containmentof China by defeating Vietnam is not necessary. Asia is a very largecontinent. It has a diversity of cultures, traditions, states, andso on. Nations like their independence in Asia just as much as theydo in other parts of the world. To assume that some mystic inevitabilityhas decreed that they are all to be swallowed up in the Chines empire isnot convincing(485). Lewy thinks that Eisenhowers prediction ofthe domino effect was wrong. In fact Lewy believed that Americanpolicy makers went into Vietnam because of fear for the grand allianceof communism that would dominate As ia. The importance of Vietnamis over exaggerated. By 1969 South Vietnam accounted for less than onepercent of American import(487). This obviously shows the unimportanceof the economic gains in Vietnam Even if these imports were importantto United States economy, it seems that the commodities produced by thearea, such as rubber, tin and coconut oil were not irreplaceable(486). .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .postImageUrl , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:hover , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:visited , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:active { border:0!important; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:active , .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7 .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0f6ed942b1b7c502ed9de1316fa5d9a7:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: great depression interview paper EssayThe only commodity that South Vietnam had that was important to the U.S. is the potential oil off the shores. Yet the discovery is not madeuntil 1970, twenty years after the conflict had started. Needlessto say, Lewy concluded, this discovery in 1970 can hardly explain decisionstaken in the previous 20 years(487). Even as the war dragged on, the validityof American claim in Vietnam diminished. The valid fear for the spreadof Red Asia under the leadership of Russia came to a halt in the mid-1960s. As Lewy pointed out Russia and China were no longer close allies but openenemies. It is therefore no valid claim to stay in Vietnam for theworld communist movement no longer represented a monolith(487). China turned inward and focus more on its cultural revolution. Interms of foreign policy, China sought new allies to counter-balance thepresence of its hostile Northern neighbors. The admission of Chinainto the United nations in 1971 proved the new direction that Chinese foreignpolicy head toward. As Lewy stated, Communism had ceased to be thewave of the future(487). It seems that after series of claims tobe in Vietnam fell short, the only reason to go in is the preservationof democracy. Democracy is the one claim which compelled us to stayin Vietnam. Yet again Lewy doubted the great moral claim. Hebelieved that United motives to go into Vietnam was not as altruistic asit seemed; the main motive of the war was to defend the title of UnitedStates as the dominant power in the world. Such challenge is statedwhen North Vietnamese Defense Minster declared in July 1964 that SouthVietnam is the vanguard fighter of the nation liberation movement in thepresent era and the failure of the special war unleashed by the U.S. imperialists in South Vietnam would mean that this war can be defeatedanywhere in the world. (487) It is not surprising that presidentsimmediately begin to declare Vietnam as a vital interest of U.S.200,000 U.S military personnel were in Vietnam by early 1966, despite thefact that Vietnam was not a region of major military of industrial importance.(488) United States was ready to defend its world supremacy throughthe battles of Vietnam. What was worse for the United States wasthe arrogant attitude. United States was not like France, who couldwithdraw from Indochina and North Africa without a serious loss of prestige.(488) Many people believed this philosophy to be true. In facteven as the situation became worse during Johnsons and Nixons administration,it was still important to liquidate the American commitment without ahumiliating defeat. (488) The defeat however is inevitable and theimpact of the war was more devastating than the optimistic Americans hadpredicted. The fall of Vietnam marks the most humiliatingdefeat in American History. Americans were awaken by the trauma ofVietnam. A No more Vietnams psychology sprung up all over the country. Lewy commented that American turn to isolationism in hope that such andisaster will never happen again. Lewy stated that the United Statescannot and should not be the worlds policeman. (490) The resultfor taking up a moral burden such as Vietnam only results in the severecasualties. Despite what the American ideal for democracy, Lewy concluded,we can not support and change the world. The Statesman cannot bea saint (491) as the Korean Conflict and Vietnam conflict had shown tothe American people. The American idealism changed significantlybecause of the impact of Vietnam war. Lewy ended his essay with one of the mostfrequently asked questions: could the United States have won in Vietnam?Lewy suggested that United States started off on the wrong foot in thebeginning. Simple motives like fighting for democracy in Vietnamand halting communist aggression while having some truth in them arenot enough to justify the position of U.S. intervention. PresidentJohnson also made a mistake in the beginning of the war because of hisconfidence. He constantly spoke of success and light at the endof the tunnel, but continued to dispatch additional troops while casualtiesmounted steadily. (492) The turning of the war from a limited warto a full scale occurred as more troops were sent in. Yet while Johnsonwas willing to send in more troops, he was unwilling to declare war. American people did not know what they were fighting for because of theundeclared war. Further, without industrial mobilization on the homefront, the mission was destined to fail. The nation ended up fightinga limited with the full employment of its military power restricted throughelaborate rules of engagements and limitations while for its determinedopponent the war was total. (492)Lewy did not deny that the war was lostmilitarily. In fact he believed that U.S. strategy was wrong fromthe beginning. He wrote that the U.S. failed to understand the realstakes in a revolutionary war. (497) United States army failed torealize the objective of the war. Edward G. Landsdale once wrotethat the Vietnamese Communist generals saw their armed forces a instrumentsprimarily to gain political goals. The American generals saw their forcesprimarily as instruments to defeat enemy military forces. (497)As a result Lewy concluded, the enemys endurance and supply of manpowerproved stronger than American persistence in keeping up the struggle.(497) The resolute Vietnamese opposition simply demoralized our willto fight. When they suffered major casualties it strengthened themwhile it weaken United States morale when we suffered major casualties. Finally Lewy believed that The United States had set out on the wrong footfrom the beginning. The war, Lewy commented, not only had to bewon in South Vietnam, but it had to be won by the South Vietnamese. (497)Yet it seems that from the beginning of the conflict, The Republic of Vietnamdid not have the zeal that the U.S. did. The United States howeverfailed to stress the importance of the role the South Vietnamese shouldplay. As a result the war could not be won because we were not Vietnamese. Henry Kissinger inevitably concluded that outside effort can only supplement,but not create local efforts and local will to resist. (499) TheUnited States could neither win a war nor lose one because it is not ourwar. The failure of the Vietnamese people to take their active rolesin their revolutionary war was the cause for the lost war. Lewy thereforeconcluded that with the war lost on the enemy front, home front and theVietnamese front, the war in Vietnam could not be won. .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .postImageUrl , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:hover , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:visited , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:active { border:0!important; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:active , .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3 .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ue20df6343133550624a738c082a069c3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Romance that took place in Act 2 EssayFinally, in The Last War, The Next War,and The New Revisionists Walter LaFeber also attempts to address the Vietnamquestion. He first addresses the reason for the losing of the war. He brings up the Westmoreland Thesis which argued that the conflict wasnot lost on the battlefield, but at home where overly sensitive politiciansfollowed a no-win policy to accommodate a misguided minority opposition.and that the enemy finally won the war politically in Washington. (500)Other revisionist historians like Gelband Betts proposed that it was notthe system; that failed the failure was to be blamed on the Americanpeople who never understood the war and finally tired of it, and on thePresident who supinely followed the people. (501) Lewy, anotherhistorian further, clarified Westmorelands argument that antiwar groupswrongly labeled Vietnam illegal and immoral. But Lewy inevitablydestroyed Westmorelands thesis when he mentioned the massacre at My Laiand at Cam Ne. The blame for losing the war, therefore LaFeber concluded,is split among the Revisionists and the other historians. LaFeber then addresses the impact of thewar to build up his thesis of the Revisionists. He argues that Vietnamgreatly altered the world balance of power and that American powerhas dramatically declined, politically as well as militarily. (501)The lessons of Vietnam invariably became the basis for American foreignpolicy for the next decade. The Afghanistan and Iran crisis duringCarters administration showed that lessons of Vietnam had finally takenitself in the form of the nations policy. Furthermore, Ronald Reaganproclaimed in one of speeches that we must rid ourselves of the Vietnamsyndrome. (503) Therefore LaFeber concluded that the lesson of Vietnamhad changed U.S. foreign policy greatly. Lastly, LaFeber discusses the argumentsof the new revisionists. He criticizes their explicit claims andthe facts that they chose to ignore. The new revisionists claim thatthe country has been misguided by the opinions of the minority is notcorrectly stated. Herbert Schandlers study had shown that the latestpublic opinions rallied behind the president. (503) Even as the antiwarmovements increased during late 1970, the public opinions did not turnthe president. LaFeber showed that it did not stop Nixon from expandingthe conflict into Cambodia and Laos. (504) Therefore LaFeber concludedthat the Antiwar movements had been greatly overrated by the Revisionists. The Revisionist instead should emphasize the defeat military in Vietnam. The Revisionists also concentrated too much on the Soviet Union. Instead they should focus on the instability of the Third World areasthat the Soviets have at times turned to their own advantage. (505)The Revisionists therefore did not understand where the problems were insouth East Asia. LaFeber also stressed that the Revisionist had underestimatedUnites States military power. American military will is not lacking;the troops as LaFeber pointed out were supported by the most powerfulnaval and air force ever used in Asia. (505) Bombs were droppedevery minute on Vietnam. Therefore neither the will nor the poweris lacking in the war. The war was lost not because U.S. declinedin power but rather from the overestimation of American Power. (505)The Revisionists, suggested LaFeber, over-exaggerated some of the issues. If the power of United States wereoverestimated, the war then was lost because of the aid of our allies andthe cost of the war. The Revisionists often overlooked this subject,LaFeber argued. He pointed out that of the forty nations tied tothe United States by treaties only four- Australia, New Zealand, SouthKorea, and Thailand- committed any combat troops. (506) Even SouthKorea, a country which owed much to U.S., only send troops after Washingtonbribed them. The failure of the aid from the coalition eventuallyundermined the U.S. effort in Vietnam. The will of the people whichthe Revisionists stressed as the downfall of the war is also affected bythe cost of the war. The American people simply did not want to fighta bread and butter war. Domestically, the Great Society Program mustbe sacrificed to accommodate the war. The great cost of the war eventuallyinfluenced the public sentiment so much that the will of people favorspeace. By overlooking the two key aspects of the war, LaFeber c oncluded,the Revisionists attempt to make the war more acceptable, and hopedto make the next war legitimate, even before where it will be or whatit will be fought over. (508)These three articles in Conflict and Consensusall showed remarkably similarity not only in their subjects but also intheir opinions. They all attempted to address why the United Stateslost the war. In doing so they also addressed the attitude of Americanpeople and the military forces. They analyzed the strength of theU.S. military power and the Vietnamese forces. They all asked thequestion of why the war started and what importance was Vietnam. But despite the similarities of the three articles, they differ in details. While Baritz addressed the loss of Vietnam,he attributed the loss to the ignorance and haughty attitude of Vietnam. She stressed the myth of America as the Gods chosen country and believedthat we lost the war because we were too arrogant and too confident ofourselves. Baritz argued that Americans put too much faith into technology,Bureaucracy and the myth. These things she addressed as the downfallof United States. Lewy shared a different view when he attemptedto address the loss of Vietnam. He attacked the conflict from thebeginning, doubting the importance of Vietnam and United States motiveto interfere. He also addressed some of the major forces that turnedpublic opinion against the war such as TV, the lack of declaration of war,and the antiwar movements. On a military scale, Lewy also addressedthe ineptitude of the American army to fight a revolutionary war and thefailure to draw the Vietnamese into their own war. Lewy proposeda more comprehensive theory from the beginning to the end of how the UnitedStates could lose the war. LaFebers interest in his article howeveris not addressing how Ameri ca lost the war. But nevertheless by rejectingsome of the Revisionists points of view, he revealed a different scopeof the war. He rejected Westmorelands theory and pointed out thatthe public sentiment was favoring the president and the war. He rejectedthe focus of the war on Communism and Russia to show that the South EastAsia problem is a question of stability not communism. LaFeber alsopointed out the common misunderstanding of the conflicts central politicaland military features. He believed that United States overestimatedits own power. Furthermore he revealed the reluctance of Americanallies to commit its troops, and he revealed that the public is unwillingto sacrifice butter for guns. LaFebers view therefore is extremelydifferent from the two historians mentioned before yet he still attemptedto address the same questions.